Home
 Content
 Lead article
 Industry
 EBI
 Bio-eye
 Events
BioInformer Logo -- click for homepage

A publication of EMBL - Outstation Hinxton, The European Bioinformatics Institute

EBI logo -- click for homepage
biobrddwn

Report on Assessment of Smith-Waterman Sequence Search Tools Implemented in Bioccelerator, FDF and MasPar

Abstract

Analysis of database (SWISS-PROT) search performance, using a set of query protein sequences, by the three implementations of Smith-Waterman search algorithm (namely, Bioccelerator, Fast Data Finder - FDF, and MasPar) indicated that database search speed assumes an asymptotic behaviour as the length of the query sequence increases. Given the configurations available for this study, FDF is faster followed by Bioccelerator and MasPar. An increase in the subject database size brings about a disproportionate increase in MasPar search time while in Bioccelerator and FDF it is nearer to a proportionate increase.

Analysis of the ranking of search results by the three implementations indicated that the hit sequences are appropriately classified into groups of evolutionarily/functionally related members and all three implementations produce the same groups. The range of scores for the closely related group is distinctly higher than that of other groups. In every instance of the test queries (except in one case) the three implementations pick all the related sequence entries from SWISS-PROT database as top hits before picking up any unrelated sequences. Even though the default gap penalties (especially the gap extension) are different in the implementations, the ranking order of the hits are remarkably similar among the implementations (in general a reordering of 5 takes place and such a reordering always occurs within a group). In 9 of 17 instances of the query, the scores of the top group is similar among the implementations while in the remaining 8 cases a difference of 2-10% can be observed.

Availability

The complete report is available both as HTML or as PDF document. A separate document (HTML or PDF) shows cost-effectiveness of the machines tested, but note that this comparison is not final because most prices are bargainable.

Written by: Alphonse Thanaraj


 

Resources and further information

External sites are not endorsed by EMBL-EBI

biobrddwn

Direct questions or comments to Bioinformer Editor. This page last modified Friday, 16 July, 1999.
ISSN 1462-1363.
More information about the BioInformer.

(c) 1997-1999 EMBL-EBI. All Rights Reserved.